Imagine living in a world where a mere hint of different ancestry could forever alter your life and generations to come. This harsh reality defined colonial America through the “one-drop rule,” a principle that created social and institutional racism, resulting in lost lives, shattered dreams, torn families, and internalized self-hatred. Emerging in 17th-century Virginia in 1662, this rule classified individuals with even a single African ancestor as Black, regardless of appearance or heritage.

Read more: Exposed: Why the World Hates Black People

The relationship between Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings is an example of the implications of the rule. Jefferson had children with Hemings, a woman who was enslaved and half-sister to Jefferson’s wife, Martha. Despite their European characteristics, Sally and her children were classified as enslaved Blacks under Virginia law.

The one-drop rule spread rapidly, with Virginia’s 1705 one-eighth rule being followed by similar laws in twenty states by 1910. Arkansas’s 1911 Act 320 codified the rule, criminalizing interracial relationships and relegating individuals with African ancestry to second-class citizenship.

White skin was associated with freedom and privilege, while melanated skin was associated with slavery and marginalization. Langston Hughes, an American poet and social activist, highlighted the rule’s impact, noting the disparate application of the term ‘Negro’ in the US versus Africa.

Read more: 10 Countries with the Highest Black Population Outside of Africa

As early as 1630, authorities enforced laws prohibiting interracial relationships, with Hugh Davis being whipped for engaging in interracial relations with a Black woman. These laws were designed to keep races apart and reinforce white supremacy. Segregation and anti-miscegenation laws were supported by wealthy whites in an attempt to control their enslaved population.

Jim Crow laws furthered systemic racism and inequality, by mandating separation along racial lines. These laws regulated white individuals’ conduct, which maintained rigid color lines and white supremacy. They also influenced legal definitions of race, with different laws in different states defining different races. For example, in 1822, a Virginia law classified individuals with at least one-quarter African ancestry as “mulatto.”

The Nat Turner rebellion in 1831 caused Virginia to limit Black individuals’ freedoms. Due to concerns about impacting those considered legally white, the one-drop rule was modified in 1853. By 1930, Virginia had declared anyone with a trace of African descent to be Black.

In contrast, New Orleans recognized Creoles of Color as a separate group from Whites and Blacks. This group, with mixed ancestry, enjoyed social mobility and relative privileges. Creoles played a complex role, serving as a buffer between white and black people while perpetuating segregation and racial hierarchies. Their European ancestry gave them privileged positions, showing Louisiana’s complex racial dynamics.

The caste system in Louisiana also classified individuals based on their African ancestry, with terms like “quadroon” and “octoroon” reflecting the societal obsession with racial hierarchy. Following the Civil War, Southern states enacted Black Codes to restrict Black people’s rights and maintain a cheap labour force.

These codes helped create Jim Crow laws, which legalized racial segregation and disenfranchisement. States like Tennessee, Louisiana, Texas, and Mississippi adopted the one-drop rule. These laws undermined Black people’s economic mobility, voting rights, and access to public facilities, education, and transportation, perpetuating systemic racism.

Read more: How America Committed Genocide Against Its Black Citizens in Tulsa 1921

Walter Ashby Plecker, a white supremacist and physician, enforced the one-drop rule in Virginia through the Racial Integrity Act of 1924, prohibiting interracial marriage and redefining racial classifications. However, the landmark case of Loving vs. Virginia in 1967 overturned such laws, declaring anti-miscegenation laws unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court ruled that Virginia’s law violated the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses, marking a significant milestone in the fight against racial segregation and discrimination. The case was brought by Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, a Black woman, who challenged their conviction for violating Virginia’s anti-miscegenation law after marrying in Washington, D.C.

The one-drop rule wasn’t unique to the US; similar laws existed in other societies, such as Latin America and Nazi Germany. In Brazil, racial classifications were varied, but did not necessarily mean greater equality. The Nuremberg Laws of 1935, while not adopting the full one-drop rule, defined Jewishness based on ancestry, enabling the Nazis’ systematic persecution and genocide of six million Jews during the Holocaust. The dangers of racial purity ideologies and their devastating consequences are highlighted by these laws.

The one-drop rule’s legacy continues to influence American societal consciousness and racial identity. The controversy surrounding Rachel Dolezal and the introduction of multiracial identification in the 2000 U.S. Census highlight ongoing debates about racial authenticity, identity, and categorization. These conversations reflect the complexities of racial identity in a society where ancestry, culture, and self-identification intersect.

Conclusion

As we reflect on the tragic history of the one-drop rule, we’re met with a bittersweet reminder of the enduring power of social constructs. The artificial boundaries that have divided us for centuries are a testament to the human capacity for both cruelty and resilience.

As we move forward, we’re reminded that the work of breaking down these barriers is far from over. But we’re also consoled by the knowledge that every step towards a more equitable society is a testament to the human spirit’s capacity for growth, empathy, and love. In the end, the one-drop rule’s history teaches us that race is a social construct, but racism is a human choice.

Photo by Analise Benevides on Unsplash